Comments

• timfcsm 03:40 am 20-Jun-2013 this is absurd...member of the Commission should be fired from his post

• Alex 03:57 am 20-Jun-2013 are you kidding? Idiots

• Vorber 04:41 am 20-Jun-2013 The most stupid decision in domain contests I've ever seen.

• Sergey 05:30 am 20-Jun-2013 Here we must consider the adequacy of the post the person who made ​​the decision and it was not a bribe. Because that adequate person to take such a decision could not.

• Moden 07:58 am 20-Jun-2013 R. Glen Ayers you are crazy?

• Toast 01:36 pm 20-Jun-2013 wow, this is awesome "over 40,000 people “like” Complainant’s Facebook page". So this is why he have more rights on this domain name.

• Eugene 01:49 pm 20-Jun-2013 I think this is the fair decision. If one has registered a domain and hadn't created anything on that domain for many years, he shouldn't be able to extort money from those who create! And I think it would be fair if he even won't be able to renew the domain again and again!

• Eric 02:07 pm 20-Jun-2013 Since when stealing domains is legal?

• ww0rm 03:38 pm 20-Jun-2013 Yes, I live in Ukraine. Yes, I see many stupid decisions. But it`s.. It`s a awardee winner of the "Dumbest decisions of the XXI cent."

• Andy 04:49 pm 20-Jun-2013 Dishonest decision.

• kampaster 09:14 pm 20-Jun-2013 The silliest decision. To dismiss the member of the commission!