search engine e.g Yahoo Google Alta Vista reveals millions of hits namely websites web pages and references to HUNTER which without any notable exceptions demonstrates countless third-party uses in connection with goods services and

http //google.com/intl/pt/ Google s Portuguese Website In addition Google operates websites at numerous ccTLDs including google.co.uk United Kingdom google.com.br Brazil google.com.ar Argentina google.fr France google.ch Switzerland google.ca

confusingly similar claim See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

of search results for UNIX at Google Many of the entries include the names of licensees of the UNIX trademark Other entries relate to reviews features and commentary about the UNIX system None of the web addresses include unix alone in association

similarity claim See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

to Complainant s marks See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

its website turn up in the Google search engine in response to particular queries In fact these search engine results are also the product of the Complainant s own actions Unable to obtain registration of pwc.com at the time of its formation the

word as hello A search on Google results in over 8 million website listings for the word hello The term hello is generic and cannot operate as a trademark certainly not for the purposes of the Policy At best the Hello mark is a weak descriptive

the Internet search engine Google yielded 2.4 million pages on the Internet containing the name Gloria From an Internet yellow pages directory search there are a 100 businesses in the US incorporating the word The disputed domain name resolves

Google Inc v Jon G Claim Number FA0203000106084 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Mountain View CA Complainant represented by Julia Anne Matheson of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP Respondent is Jon G Hong Kong Respondent

its name SIERRA INNOTEK A Google search conducted on November 20 2001 for the words Sierra Innotek did not turn up a single match Moreover Sierra does not use the Domain Name to identify itself or to advertise its services or products At the

was updated and was cached by Google It is alleged that on September 28 2001 this cache showed a site which contained only the words www.liverpoolfc.com and This domain is for sale However by September 28 2001 the words This domain is for sale had

results from a search in google.com using the keyword sex horse Respondent also asserts that he could not develop the website much because of the decline of the Internet business and Respondent lack of time 3 Registration and Use in Bad Faith

Response Exhibit E Google search engine results Counsel for Complainant has contacted Respondent and its counsel and the two sides have disagreed as to the relative merits of their legal positions regarding the disputed domain name

to sell makeup A search of Google search engine for the word LACROSS reveals 10800 listings for the word Although the proper dictionary spelling of the sport lacrosse is with an e at the end the sport is commonly described with or without the e

elusive A search on the Google search engine and searches in address and telephone databases in both white and yellow pages on the Internet yielded no result for the name Simon Postles the Respondent s hotmail address or any company called

Out of some 8290 hits on the Google search engine for example almost every single hit relates to Complainant or its activities over the past few years None of the hits that the Panel saw in this search related in any way to Respondent or his

use of the word SPRITE Using google.com as search engine and searching SPRITE on Swedish pages Respondent found numerous activities using the name SPRITE These included among others software horses motor vehicles and publications One of these was

of similar actions See Google Inc v Goog LR f/k/a Seocho FA 98462 Nat Arb Forum Sept 28 2001 transferring googlr.com to Complainant who holds GOOGLE see also Pfizer Inc v Seocho and Vladimir Snezko D2001-1199 WIPO Nov 28 2001 transferring

for Gilles Arseneau in the google.com search engine or in any available listing of Laval Quebec businesses Furthermore the telephone number given on the www site is that of a person who is apparently unrelated to the Respondent and the www site