search for the name on the Google search engine Without proof to the contrary it is doubtful that such a person exists The Complainant asserts that the Respondent registered the domain name and is using it in bad faith Specifically the

with the Complainant A google.com search on SFM yielded over 60000 web pages having no affiliation with the Complainant 7 The Complainant has no valid trademark on which to base the Complaint Pending trademark applications do not provide the

e 12 1 van general www groups google //www pscu ca sale and R S C F A J P T D p asiadomainmarket daisy1@dreamwiz daisyl@dreamwiz Enic net Esex org harrypotters co kr networksolutionis networksolutuons networksoluotions daisy1 dreamwiz.com daisyl

a duty to do a search like a Google search to find prior similar domain names or marks on different registers even though were I a legislator or Supreme Court Justice I would vote for that duty to be recited in instructions to all registrants

ha consultado en el buscador Google en páginas en español la denominación ENCE aparecen numerosas referencias algunas de ellas no vinculadas en origen al demandante Grupo Empresarial Ence S.A aunque sí en su mayoría Se han producido diversos

of confusing similarity See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

chose autogiant saying the Google data base reveals 139000 hits on auto giant and saying there can be no bad faith finding in connection with a domain name containing nothing more than a common description term that described a large automaker

Classes 38 and 42 Google owns the domain name GOOGLE.COM which was registered on September 15 1997 and which has been used to identify Google s website since on or about that date Google s trademark rights in its GOOGLE mark based on

also provided evidence of a Google search which disclosed a Francis R Grenier at the same address as that given in the Whois record for the registrant of the domain name A discussion of this issue is provided in section 6 below C The Use of the

for the keyword crockpot on google.com is evidence of this fact and that t he word is used on 159000 web pages without reference to The Rival Company or their alleged trademark Id As an initial matter the Panel would have to consider whether this

en los conocidos buscadores google.com y yahoo.es los resultados arrojados no llevan a ninguna página de la Demandante o productos o servicios por ella ofertados incluso aparece una página argentina en la que la expresión controvertida parece

he is pointing it at a Google search page on which the official commercial site of the Complainant appears as the first item The Respondent says he has plans to substitute his own site in future and it is not at all clear that this use will

PIER 1 mark see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

completed a search of Google for the name land instead of LAND.BIZ then he would have found that it returns 32600000 results and that such results do not indicate exclusive rights to the common English word land · if a Web site is

English word a search of Google produces 4.44 million results exhibit K The Complainant does not own any gTLD reflecting the word cotton only and simply wishes to have a domain name shorter than the ones currently in use exhibit H thereby

similar to the mark google and domain name google.com expecia.com confusingly similar to the marks Expedia and Expedia.com and the domain name expedia.com Here each of the Contested Domain Names differs from Complainant mark and domain

can be demonstrated by a Google search for the Respondent email address which shows several domain names which are stated by the Respondent to be for sale and some of which employ third parties registered trademarks i.e linux-hw.com Kommersant

by Respondent of the mark A Google search under Exult does not produce any results that appear to be associated with Respondent The name Exult does not appear in any public records associated with Respondent There is no directory listing for

GmbH is a sham Complainant s Google search for Broadcom GmbH produced no results The domain name connected with Respondent s contact e-mail address broadcom.de redirects Internet users to an unrelated commercial web hosting company Complainant

89700000 results for find at Google.com DISCUSSION Paragraph 15 a of the STOP Rules instructs this Panel to decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy these Rules and any rules and