com doregi www yahoo co kr google altavista B V 라� info biz //erima vat C A 스포츠용� �을 용� �에 상� � � � �에서야 정상� �� 직 간접으로 erima.com

mythology search results on google.com The domain name aetna.net is identical and confusingly similar to Complainant s corporate name and the AETNA marks registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and other trademark registries

or rights A query run on the Google.com search engine for the word vanguard without the word group to exclude references to Complainant showed that the word appears on over 340000 third party web pages A few of the third party uses are Name URL

is not relevant see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

the internet browser See also Google Inc versus Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 Also in this case in particular in view of the comparative length of the trademarks of the Complainant in relation to the disputed Domain

Respondent s search of the Google �� database for travel smart revealed about 17900 results Further others have registered domain names using the term TRAVEL SMART Numerous other TRAVEL SMART formative domain names remain unused in the available

to this name on the Google.com google.com search engine for example The name essentially describes the nature of Complainant business a type of business shared by numerous other mortgage companies apparently including that of Respondent

· When a search is done in google the trademark of the Complainant comes out in the first search results · Respondent is not using the trademark MICHELIN and therefore there is no need to request any kind of permission for registering the

widely recognized mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

similar analysis See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

and search engines such as Google see point 4.29 supra 5 Respondent is also exposed to International newspapers see point 4.13 supra 6 Independent investigation conducted by this Panel shows that when entering a query for the word NASDAQ on

the phrase onkyo movement on google.com returns many results All of these are examples of fair use of a generic descriptive term Trademark law generally does not provide rights to use such terms The Respondent has a legitimate interest in using

search results from the Google search engine in Annex A to the Response various web-based news articles which the Respondent provides in Annexes B and E to the Response the hard copy article in Annex B is entitled �Las Vegas Wash Coordination

s business see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

on the popular search engine Google.com which itself ranks the listings according to the number of links to them Respondent was able to find numerous and in some cases blatant use of Complainant s claimed mark msn associated with web sites from

search engines yahoo.com and google.com were provided as Annexes K1 and K2 In the absence of the non-use of the domain name there appears to be no explanation of the facts other than that the Respondent registered the Complainant s domain name

php A U 040 296-9 www google terra crew 34 16 a y hispaseguridad org/ macys biz Tysys i e cotty hispaseguridad.net felix postmaster servired.info webmaster hispaseguridad secureroot.com c el la 21 08 2002 title www.directnic.com legal

more frequently visited than google.com or nytimes.com id paragraphs11-13 15-16 and Exhibit 8   Respondents have not disputed this evidence although as noted in the following section they do dispute its relevance.  Respondents similarly do not

on the Internet search engine Google for the word insurance yielded 27.8 million third �party web pages A finding of multiple third �party results on the Google search engine has been expressly recognized in Gene Logic Inc v Cho Kyu Bock FA103042

faith under the Policy See Google Inc v www.google.com and Jimmy Siavesh Behain D2000-1240 WIPO Nov 9 2000 finding respondent s false representation to the registrar that its domain name did not infringe the rights of any third party constituted