using the Overture.com and Google.com search engines The Complainant has been advertising on Overture.com since May 1 2002 and spends on average U 20000 U 30000 advertising per month on its site The Respondent carries on business trading as Pet

to Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

Consitex on the search engine Google refer to Complainant or its subsidiary The domain name at issue is identical to the common law trademark of Complainant Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name at issue There is no

from an establish mark See Google Inc v Namerental.com WIPO Case No D2001-0060 February 27 2001 Here the Domain Name is identical to the registered trademark save for a y being used instead of an i resulting in vyagra instead of viagra It is

use of the term An advanced google.com search for the term American singles and American Single excluding MatchNet to eliminate results related to Complainant yielded over 95000 combined third-party uses respectively of the descriptive terms

devoted to him Evidence of a Google.com search shows 122000 web pages with the name Humphrey Bogart and 416000 web pages containing the name Bogart Respondent does not dispute that the disputed domain name is identical to Complainant s trademark

Complainants contend that a Google search conducted on April 3 2003 using the terms SIB Mortgage turned up a link to www.sib-mortgage.com and text that refers to the SIB Mortgage Store See Annex 12 to the Complaint Complainants argue that

false by a simple search on Google.com for speedoboyz for which there are 208 responses Understandably the Complainant isn t looking for gay men in skimpy swimwear and could be excused for not knowing that speedoboyz.com is relatively well-known

closest to nine A search at google.com provided 998000 unique results for the term Baccarat of which none of the initial results provided any information pertaining to the Complainant or its goods and services Each of the initial results

WIPO Case No D2000-0554 and Google Inc v wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Siavesh Behain WIPO Case No D2000-1240 As represented with numerous details and supported by documentary evidence the Complainant has exposed that when a visitor mistypes

etc Respondent contends a Google search returns approximately 1480 separate results that include MONTECASTELLI so MONTECASTELLI cannot be considered to be unique Respondent argues that MONTECASTELLI is not a thing or a name invented by

assertions Respondent s googlejobs.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googlejobs.com domain name Respondent registered and used the

assertions Respondent s googlejobs.net and googoljobs.com domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googlejobs.net and googoljobs.com domain names

associated with Complainant Google Advanced Search results May 13 2003 id Annex 2 The referenced web pages include those on http //hergiftcertificates.com http //getagiftcertificate.com and http //amazon.com id According to the Registrar s

name registration FINDINGS Google Technology Inc formerly known as Google Inc Google or Complainant brings this complaint against googleDeluxe.com c/o Kevin Aspden collectively Respondent Google Inc changed its name to Google Technology Inc in

utilizing the search engines Google Altavista Lycos and Yahoo has revealed only web sites and articles related to Complainants trademark and products In light of these results Complainants conclude that Respondent was not at the time of filing nor

in 81 domain names and a google search yielded 653000 third party uses of this descriptive term Because it is composed of a common descriptive term Respondent was vested with irrevocable rights and legitimate interest in the disputed domain at

famous HOTJOBS.COM mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

on the search engines Yahoo Google Lycos and La Toile du Québec all of which refer to the Complainant s dictionary Le Grand dictionnaire terminologique at its granddictionnaire.com domain name 4.2 The Respondent In the absence of a detailed

s DIEBOLD mark See Google Inc v Freije FA 102609 Nat Arb Forum January 11 2002 finding the addition of the generic word sex to the GOOGLE mark in a domain name was confusingly similar to Complainant s mark Accordingly the Panel finds