use An advanced search on google.com for pages that include the term gallup but do not include the terms gallup poll gallup organization and gallup inc to avoid pages referencing Complainant yielded 498000 third party uses of the term gallup

domain name to resolve to the Google search engine is similarly not a legitimate use.· Respondent misappropriation of the mikerosoft.net domain name was not by accident because the MICROSOFT mark is world famous and distinctive and the

efectuando una búsqueda en Google de la palabra monografiass con lo cual se puede comprobar el gran número de páginas web que enlazan a www.monografiass.com y prueban el reconocimiento del sitio web d Argumenta la demandada que hace un uso

to Complainant mark See Google Inc v Freije FA 102609 Nat Arb Forum January 11  2002 finding the addition of the generic word sex to the GOOGLE mark in a domain name was confusingly similar to Complainant mark see also Rollerblade Inc v

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

made in the international Google Yahoo and MSN internet search engines shows that in each search engine all of the first 20 hits on the name Eminem refer to the Complainant activities as shown in Annex 12.The Complainant is also the owner of

confusion and points to Google „¢ search results for car warranties direct and car warranty direct which list Respondent s site first arguing that this is further evidence of likelihood of confusion B Respondent The Respondent did not reply

and search engines such as Google and Yahoo A statement in large bold letters stating www.bmw1.com available for sale could be seen A link providing a contact to the webmaster led to a page that provided a form that could be filled out for

Google Inc v googleemail a/k/a googleemail.com Claim Number FA0401000232960 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc 2400 Bayshore Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 Complainant represented by Rose Hagan of Google Inc Respondent is googleemail a/k/a

users Respondent says that a GOOGLE search he conducted using the words Pearl Jam returned 1430000 hits Of those hits Respondent says that his own website appeared at position No.323 and that Complainant s website appeared at position No.1

en el motor de búsqueda google aparece en primer lugar y cuanto menos los nueve siguientes noticias sobre la entidad financiera demandante 6 Alegaciones de las Partes A Demandante El demandante argumenta que los nombres de dominio

Internet search conducted on google.com elicited the fact that TPRF is an acronym for many other things besides The Prem Rawat Foundation e.g Texas Photo Record File texasbirds.org/tbrc/ar2000 Torpedo Run Facility

Annex G When searching the Google search engine for globalticketmaster only a few not relevant hits are shown whereas a search for Ticketmaster would reveal about 808000 hits Hence according to the Complainant it is unconceivable that the

noted that if you conduct a Google search for starefall the suggestion is made to search for starfall which suggests that the wording is very close indeed There is also a likelihood of confusion between comstarfall.com and STARFALL since the

A review of the results of a Google search of the phrase target wholesale demonstrates this fact The results list for this search does not include respondents site In contrast a Google search of the generic term target results in a list of sites

referencing the Complainant A Google search using the same terms produces 6040 hits with twenty of the top twenty items referencing the Complainant 6.9 Although the Complainant does not hold a statutory trademark in the name Bob Avila the

out of the first page of a google search for cosmo indicating that there are over 1600000 instances where the word cosmo is used in different locations and for diverse purposes Further the Respondent mentions that the word τέ is another

in any search engine such as Google or Yahoo and instantly be redirected to the respective org and net websites and not only bayaspirina.com 7 Counsel to Complainant contacted Mr Carpio offering to buy the domain names bayaspirina.com.ar and

million results for staple in Google By employing these tactics Complainant is purposely diverting traffic from Respondent s site to its own Once again all of these partner links have been removed from Respondent s website The confusion Complainant

is evidence specifically the Google search results designated with Complainant s additional submission to conclude that Complainant has been known and recognized by such name to its wine drinking customers The domain names registered by Respondent