especialmente la página google.com la cual arroja referencias al nombre en muchos casos vinculado con una especie de refrigerador El Panel ha localizado además dos marcas registradas incluyendo el vocablo Minibar �ELECTROLUX MINIBAR y EMS

Fu and/or Complainant The Google search results against the mark ZUNG FU shows how well-known the mark is to the public in Hong Kong and the region as well as the Internet community On the other hand Respondent is not and has never been

searching for �11833 � on google.com you get more than 60.000 hits The Respondent also claims that the Respondent does not intent to offer goods and services for � as the Panel understands it which the trademark �11833 � is registered The

Respondent notes that a Google search for the expression bulldog � gives 1770000 results for sites from all over the world with only a few references to Complainants Besides the issue whether Complainants � trademarks are well-known at

attempt to locate same in a Google search as shown in Annex 7 Respondent has in the past registered several domain names on readily apparent generic terms such as �custodians � �insulator � �greenlawn � �curtainrod � as well as �agile � �LFO �

bad faith under the UDRP See Google Inc v wwwgoogle.com D2000-1240 WIPO Nov 9 2000 B Respondent The Response does not address the substantive issues It merely states in pertinent part As of April 22 2004 the date the complaint was filed

as illustrated by a Google search As such the phrase is not a source indicator and absent compelling evidence of secondary meaning cannot be used exclusively by one person to the exclusion of others.While the Complaint certainly presents

and a geographical location A Google search demonstrates that there are millions of examples of third-party uses of the word with no connection to Complainant When Respondent registered dong.com in October 1996 it did not know nor had any reason to

a common search engine like Google which is accessible for everyone and free of charge revealed many hits mentioning the Thalys train and the services related to this train The Complainant is also owner of THALYS domain names under various gTLDs

and newer engines such as Google.2 The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain NameThe Respondent has no legal rights or interests in using the Applegate name for its domain name either in the United

S L camper net com fr �www google us info

domain name from the mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

mit der Suchmaschine Google nach der Marke PAUL & SHARK ergibt ca 413'000 Treffer.B Der Beschwerdegegner Der Beschwerdegegner ist Herr A Both welcher auch unter dem Namen Best Souvenir und auf seiner Website via den streitigen Domainnamen

ICMA name only shows up on a Google search which is not exhibited for the first time on page 7 after many other entities also using the ICMA name Therefore he contends that Complainants claim of owning and operating the unregistered trade name

resultados del buscador google aportados por las partes y teniendo el demandado el control sobre los metatags de la página en cuestión avalan en opinión de este experto la postura del demandante Por lo expuesto este experto considera que

known by that name and a GOOGLE search for astracast webhosting produced no hits The domain name at issue is being used to host a search engine which includes links to various retail outlets which are potential customers of the Complainant and

popular search engines are 1 Google 2 Yahoo and 3 MSN On April 8 2004 Complainant used these three search engines to determine the rankings of both Complainant s and Respondent s web sites The term AIT was entered into each search engine On MSN

& Consulting Group using Google search engine reveals that the purpose of this entity would be to offer business advice business management and financial services Annex 32 to the Complaint There is also no doubt that by registering the

the trade mark COVANCE in the Google search engine shows the Respondent �s website ranked second The use of the Disputed Domain Name causes confusion amongst Internet users and potential customers and relations of Complainants The Respondent admits

domain name from the mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable