of companies such as Yahoo Google etc and the power of the Internet s commerce ability is being fueled by internet traffic both direct and optimized Most of the Icann accredited Registrars default their own domain nameservers to registered

remain a nondescript entity A Google search for the Respondent reveals only two hits related to the entity both UDRP proceedings in which Respondent was found to have wrongfully registered the domain names walmartbenfits.com and lillieskids.com

plaboy.com v PLAYBOY Google Inc v Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 News Group Newspapers Limited and News Network Limited v Momm Amed Ia WIPO Case No D2000-1623 pag3.com v PAGE3.COM AT&T Corp v Global Net 2000

� which provides the Google AdSense service for parked domains The web page lists various links to a range of websites featuring in particular teddy bears soft toys and similar items 5 Parties � Contentions A Complainant A summary of the

namely a printout of a Google search which displays Complainant s popularity In this regard Respondent states that Respondent s website is not listed by Google thus it is not stealing any clients from Complainant In connection with this

on the popular search engine Google with the keyword «private» annexed as Schedule B places the Complainants � corporate website �www.prvt.com � almost in the 40th position The Complainants � domain names corresponding to their web operations

of confusing similarity See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

Forum Jan 23 2003 see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 see also Pier 1 Imports Inc v Success Work D2001-04l9 WIPO May 16 2001 Contrary to Respondent s claim that it innocently selected the domain name to sell products

term �SMURF � is searched on Google on the Internet it provides more than 500.000 hits The Panel has established that the mark �SMURF � is recognizable and internationally famous The Panel considers it highly unlikely that the Respondent by

search terms on Overture Google and Yahoo Respondent asserts that it has never received Complainant s cease and desist letter via US postal service The reason why the corresponding web sites except for uggboots.com was not shut-down is that

from such confusion See Google Inc v Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 a minor spelling variation to a well-known mark standing alone creates a prima facie inference of bad faith b Respondent �s domain names were

mediante el buscador Google que el término �sensilis � tiene 582 entradas en páginas web accesibles en España donde aparecen productos fundamentalmente cosméticos identificados con esa marca 4.3 El demandado es D Pedro José Casado

search for the term dating on Google Complainant had a total membership of 1.84 million as of the end of 2003 which had risen to 2.03 million by March 8 2004 Of that number 1.24 million were active members meaning that they had used the site within

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

@restore names@inames google lycos yahoo vamune Irving M  Vamune restore.dk names inames.com A S trademarks names Family the

aol.tv domain to the Google news Web site See Annex G As a result AOL had no option but to initiate this proceeding to resolve this matter Respondent s bad faith use of the domain is further shown by the fact that Respondent s use of the

HEWLETT-PACKARD mark see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark capable

a common search engine like Google which is accessible to everyone and free of charge reveals hundreds of hits mentioning the Complainant �s services Therefore the Panel finds that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad faith b

over 3.2 million results in Google with complainant �s official site being at the top Any user searching for the term �cialis � therefore will have to visit the official site before proceeding to any other By visiting the official site a user

Some of the matter taken from google/http //www.google.co.in/search hl en&ie UTF-8&q kumaramangalam birla&spell 1 1.Kumaramangalam Birla whereas I have registered KUMARMANGALAMBIRLA.COM 2 Personality in focus Kumaramangalam Birla by K