arbitrary in nature e.g google where the domain owners businesses are somehow alluded to in the domain names e.g delivery is inevitable and not impermissible For example literally thousands of parties own domain names that are constituted by

sur le moteur de recherche GOOGLE du site du défendeur comme �Le grand site de petites annonces gratuites � est révélateur de la volonté du défendeur de créer la confusion dans l �esprit des consommateurs et de tirer indûment profit de

printed excerpts from a Google search for �ELC � There were apparently over 722000 results Complainant has submitted the first 12 of those The first result is Complainant �s site �www.elc.co.uk � and the sixth result is Respondent �s website

find sites and that his own google search of aol and chat does not list aolchat.com in the first five pages of results Respondent alleges that he took no actions to associate his domain name with Complainant Respondent contends that he registered

Hôtels Méridien v S.A.R.L Google France Société Des Hôtels Méridien v Mr. Cuneyt Ozarici WIPO Case No D2005-0201 and others Copies of these decisions provided as Annex 15 of the Complaint The Complainant argues that the only differences

of Respondent �s website See Google Inc v E D Havik National Arbitration Forum Case No FA14604 July 18  2002 Such attempts to �pass off � Respondent �s website as Valeant International �s does not constitute a bona fide offering of goods or

the search conducted on the Google search engine that shows no results for Tata Sky International Corporation The Complainant concludes with reference to the issue of the rights or legitimate interest that the sole purpose of the registration is

also participated in Google �s �Adsense � program under which the website displayed advertisements of other parties and received click-through commissions when internet users clicked on the links in these advertisements 5 Parties �

�s name �Nick Cannon � on google.com on August 21  2005 and at least one hundred thousands appearances of the Complainant �s name were observed The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated substantial use of the name �Nick Cannon �

via a pay-per-click keyword Google advertising campaign for the term CANDY DIRECT which appeared immediately below Complainant top spot sponsored advertisement on the Google search engine network See Exhibit H Paragraph 21 of the affidavit of

cursory AltaVista and Google searches using the words �Apple Bottoms � produces a display of primary listings for the Apple Bottoms clothing line Similar results as indicated in the search results provided in Annex 7 to the Complaint appear

as search terms using the Google Search Engine all or virtually all results refer to Complainant �s products In connection with the MSN mark Complainant has established Internet websites located at domain names comprised of the MSN mark

typed into the search engine Google Google considers this to be a misspelling of the word �chevignon � Such a misspelling is likely to divert Internet users who are potential consumers of CHEVIGNON products to the Respondent �s website As a result

this purported domain name A Google search using �share-builder.com � resolves to the Complainant �s website There is simply no evidence in the record to support the Respondent �s otherwise unsubstantiated claim regarding the meaning of share

in the Complaint to a Google search on the Respondent �s name was not helpful as the result of the Google search itself was not attached and the Complainant did not say what the result was In the circumstances discussed at subparagraphs i

top the text appears �Ads by Google � When clicking on this hint the user is informed that this program connects him to information about products and services that are relevant to the contents of the website To achieve this goal the website

in bad faith see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 Respondent unsupported statement that a potentially legitimate genealogy website will be coming soon will not suffice to demonstrate rights or interests under

evidence indicating that a Google search of the phrase The Palms Poker Room only reveals references to Complainant other than one reference pointing to the disputed domain name Respondent has not provided the Panel with any evidence to counter

The Respondent asserts that a Google search for �historic hotels � yielded over 660000 third party pages containing the term and notes several other domain names that incorporate this term including istanbulhistorichotels.com Istanbul Historic

conducted on the websites of Google.com and Google.fr Annex 20 and a hotel called Le Méridien Towers Makkah was announced to be opening in 2006 This opening has not been kept secret at all as it is advertised on the Complainant �s website