Searches performed on the Google and Yahoo databases did not reveal any business entity associated with the name �Barbara Kayne � that also used the terms in the Domain Names at issue The Respondent �s use of the Domain Names indicates its

and that a �simple search on Google.com sic with the term �Frank Muller � throws up 144000 results � The Respondent denies that he has no legitimate right or interest in the Domain Name and asserts that he does not require a license from the

complainant s marks see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

of Policy paragraph 4 a i � Google Inc.v.Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No. D2001-0060 The Panel considered the statement made by the Respondent that it had filed for the registration of the word �vadaa � as a trademark and that

en el motor de búsqueda Google reveló que la inserción de la marca SEVILLA F.C en dicho motor generó aproximadamente 2060000 resultados de los cuales una revisión aleatoria de tales resultados reveló que la mayoría de los resultados

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

of a descriptive character a Google search yields millions of web pages using the word �fax � and the addition of the prefix e merely suggests an electronic or Internet-based fax Complainant contends that Respondent was on constructive notice of

Galicia � en el buscador Google que a su juicio acreditan la notoriedad de la marca registrada Que tanto el que figura como titular actual el Demandado como el titular inicial que registró el nombre de dominio tienen su residencia fijada en

� site Search engines like Google Yahoo and MSN routinely search the web for content and attempt to relate content to keywords �Link farm � sites are specifically set up for the purpose of allowing other sites to �buy � large numbers of inbound

via a search engine such a Google will list only www.orienterprise.com and not Complainant s www.orienterprise.net 2 That Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of domain name Respondent is not associated nor connected with

by the complainant see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

to Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

un moteur de recherche comme Google pour connaître l �existence du journal �ParuVendu � C �est pourquoi tout en reconnaissant qu �il peut y avoir des coïncidences fortuites l �argumentation du défendeur même si elle est séduisante n �emporte

of the site see also Google Technology Inc v Internet Hispano S.L FA 76533 Nat Arb Forum Sept 16 2003 finding bad faith where the respondent used a domain name confusingly similar to the complainant s mark and used a logo similar to the

name By participating in Google s AdSense program or a similar service Respondent received money each time someone clicks on one of the posted links Using Complainant s well-known incontestable trademark for Respondent s commercial gain

II � into the search engine Google all results relate to the Complainant Annex F of the Complaint The name �T-Mobile � is universally recognized and relied upon as identifying the Complainant The disputed Domain Names are therefore confusingly

� The Respondent �s own Google search on the word AMBIEN shows that 75 of the sites located are not owned by the Complainant and are all diverting traffic that might otherwise go to the Complainant �s official site The Respondent did not

with the letter e see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

NAF Claim No FA150406 Google Inc v John G NAF Claim No FA106084 The Complainant points out that previous UDRP administrative panels confronted with similar factual situations concerning the Respondent have concluded that the Respondent �s

�are not smart enough to use google � This showing without more is not sufficient in the Panel �s opinion to establish bad faith under paragraph 4 b i Selling a domain name even at an exorbitant price is not per se prohibited by the Policy Rather