to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

to search engines such as Google and Yahoo for advertising of Complainant s registered mark This indirect payment from Complainant to Respondent does not create a license for Respondent s use of Complainant s mark Respondent s use of the domain

domain name from the mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

of the Respondent to Google Adsense cannot be taken into consideration as they were only submitted in French in a proceedings conducted in English they are not decisive Panels have already stated that such websites are a vehicle for

WIPO Case No D2001-0456 Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp WIPO Case No D2001-0125 Scholastic Inc v 366 Publications WIPO Case No D2000-1627 In the case of Scholastic Inc v 366 Publications the term �online � was added to the word �Scholastic � the

searches including on Google and Altavista In addition they state that the ZEGNA brand and business has been the subject of a number of international press articles which establish the fame of the ZEGNA mark Whilst the Complainants are

revenues by placing a Google search box and contextual advertising links on the bottom of the site The Complainants claim that at the time the Respondent used the armytimes.net Domain Name to redirect visitors to the

100 webpages returned by Google the Complainant does not appear but one does see two other unrelated companies selling luggage products using the generic term smart pocket ICANN Rule 3 b ix 1 ICANN Policy Paragraph 4 a i b Respondent

cannot be found with a Google search Providing false or misleading whois contact information creates a presumption of bad faith Agent Host v Host Dot Com Investments AF-0343 October 16 2000 The Procter & Gamble Company v Hong Gil Dong

and text messaging In fact a Google search of the term GR8 � results in 4.8 million �hits � In the �first come first served � basis of registering domain names common words can be legitimately registered See Asphalt Research Technology Inc v

The Respondent notes that a Google search of �PLAN NET � reveals numerous references including use by various companies in the English speaking world which the Respondent asserts have no relation to the Complainant These include an English

registration in bad faith see Google Inc v Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 and AltaVista Company v Saeid Yomtobian WIPO Case No D2000-0937 This is another factor which in this case supports the finding of bad faith made

the Domain Name including a Google search which returned millions of results and a review of the USPTO website which yielded no hits to ensure that the Domain Name did not comprise another �s trademark He also argues that the Complainant is not a

aolvideo.com domain name See Google Inc v Freije FA 102609 Nat Arb Forum Jan 11 2002 Respondent would be hard pressed to show that it had rights or legitimate interests in the domain name because Complainant s GOOGLE mark is so well known see also

conducting a search on Google for quick fare for sites with both words only gives over 16 million results while conducting a search for quickfare over 26100 sites are returned it has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the dispute

�s name �Nick Cannon � on google.com on August 21  2005 and at least one hundred thousand appearances of the Complainant �s name were observed The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated substantial use of the name �Nick Cannon � in

to promote the G-UNIT mark A Google search conducted for the term �G-Unit � gave results where the first 100 listings were virtually all references to Complainant and his G-Unit group Complaint Annex E Complainant asserts that his use of the

known as Digital City A Google Search reveals that AOL has abandoned the use of Digital City Respondent cites cases in which Complaints by AOL were denied namely Am Online v Anytime Online Traffic School FA 146930 Nat Arb Forum Apr 11 2003 In

preeminente en el buscador Google cuando se asocia la marca Deusto a la búsqueda la web del Demandado ofrece una imagen confusa y tendente al equívoco al generar dudas sobre quién es el responsable de dicha página se produce un menoscabo del

to a service provided by Google and its affiliates for the purpose called the Google AdSense for Domains program That lanson.com did not attract paying subscribers during the time when it was registered for use with the MailPlanet.com service