uses as given by a Google search he ran that yielded over 1.4 million hits the first four pages of results of which are provided in Exhibit 2 to the Response of the term �LASSIE � as further evidence of its common usage The Respondent

as powerful as Yahoo or Google Respondent also asserts that he does not use the Disputed Domain Name with unjustifiable intention Respondent contends that he will operate the site with the Disputed Domain Name in the near future and he is in

� with two search engines i.e Google and Yahoo the Panel was invariably directed to the Complainant �s product The Panel may therefore reasonably consider that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant �s trademark at the time when it registered

cabe destacar los siguientes googletravel.es grammylatinos.es googlemania.es o premiosgrammy.com Que el 14 de marzo de 2006 las Demandantes remitieron un requerimiento por burofax informando a la Demandada sobre la lesión de sus derechos

differences matter see also Google Inc v Wolfe FA 275419 Nat Arb Forum July 18 2004 The froogles.com domain name is not confusingly similar to Complainant GOOGLE mark The dissimilar letters in the domain name are sufficiently different to make it

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Free Communication Foundation Claim Number FA0604000690794 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 Respondent is Free Communication Foundation

com Dotregistrar 2 a 4 5 �www google �S beeradvocate i Unasi d b a y o

third party Complainant cites Google Inc v wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Stavesh Behain D2000-1240 WIPO Nov 9 2000 a citation which was rejected in the decision Disney Enterprises Inc v Janice McSherry d/b/a Florida Vacation Homes FA 154589 Nat Arb Forum

the letter e with r In Google Inc v Goog LR FA 98462 Nat Arb Forum Sept 28 2001 the panel found the respondent s googlr.com domain name confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark because the only difference between the domain name and

search engines of Yahoo and Google to put up content that potential visitors may find interesting relevant or useful The process is automatic and cannot account for all possible trademark infringements and dilutions Finally it points out that

but it appears from certain Google searches produced by the Complainant that it is the owner of the domain name jettours.com The Respondent appears to acknowledge that in its Response � it also produced Google search results in order to identify

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

the Complainant An advanced Google search for CACTUS CLUB without the word Café yielded 3.3 million third-party uses of the term At least 15 businesses in the USA unaffiliated with Complainant operate under the name CACTUS Respondent registered

with a third party Google Inc which also provides Internet search-engine services Respondent registered the aolgoogle.com domain name on December 17 2004 Internet users who access this domain name are directed to a generic search-engine

Internetsuchmaschine wie z B Google ergibt über 6 Millionen Treffer Allein die ersten 200 Treffer die auf Webseiten in mehreren Sprachen verweisen haben fast ausschließlich die Zeitschrift der Beschwerdeführerin zum Gegenstand Laut den

E Mail Online Präsenz Google Suche ccTLD Registrierung palodex com net 7  März 8 14 24  März 2006 5  April 12 26 28  Mai 29  September 18  November 30  Dezember Nr  8 //www wipo int/amc/en/domains/search/overview/index html  4 z

Respondent also argues that a Google search returns millions of hits for the phrase postal service and that not all of these hits relate to the United States Postal Service While this is true the Panel notes that Google attempts to rank its hits by

has exhibited the results of Google searches against �Destroy Shoes Spain � and �Destroy by Zafrilla � 4.4 Complainant �s DESTROY domain names 4.4.1 Complainant is the registrant of the following domain names www.destroy.es created February 5 1998

results of an unrestricted Google search for �Supreme Ruler � show �The significant majority of all worldwide results to a Google search for supreme ruler � result in a match to our product 496000 out of 724000 hits or about 69 of the top 100

i and a in the mark In Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 the panel concluded that the googel.com domain name was confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noted that t he transposition of two letters does