s mark Moreover the Panel in Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 found that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

ryanair uk 7 1 24 //www google co  1  D2004-0206  D2000-0270 interest 3  D2001-0505  D2004-0014 i trademark domain trademarkplus 2 4 wipo int/amc/en/domains/search/overview/index html DefaultData com  D2004-0136  D2002-0776

appears to be supported by a Google search Since the domain name is identical to the Complainant �s name and its own domain name laminarmedicaco.uk and given the popularity of the com suffix there is a risk that the public will be confused by the

Link feature provided by Google to indicate to actual and potential consumers that the Complainant sponsors the wardley.com � site which is not true Consumers clicking on wardley.com � and going to the site which displays fish and aquarium

website that featured ads by Google a Google search tool and amazon.com links The site also included a link to solicited sponsored advertising Links appearing on the site included links in competition with Complainant as well as links relating to

name was registered 3 The Google search conducted by the Respondent excluded �GmbH � so as to exclude the Complainant However it is likely that a Google search conducted before the Domain Name was registered in 2003 would have revealed the

legitimate interests in the googlevideo.com googlevideos.com googlemovie.com googlemovies.com googleforums.com and googlewebmaster.com domain names Respondent registered and used the googlevideo.com googlevideos.com googlemovie.com

has provided evidence of Google search engine results for the term homeric which returned 1.45 million results These hits overwhelmingly have nothing to do with Complainant Hence there is no factual basis for concluding that the word homeric

genus search term to display Google Adsense advertising links much as the Domain Name was used in the present case As an early Policy panel concluded in Shirmax Retail Ltd v CES Marketing Inc AF-0104 e-Resolution �Where the domain name and

Respondent The Panel did a Google search in reviewing this case on the date of December 1  2006 by typing in the browser the word �cicbanques � The search located 1130000 items in 0.04 seconds Amongst the items found where the word �cicbanques

from a search utilizing Google for the trademark SMARTGENE in which each of the top results refers back to Complainant or Complainant products and services Complainant argues that it is well-established under trademark law that two common or

that there are some hits on a Google search for the words �primus � and �globe talk � however they contend that this is limited and that the web page results mostly contain no indication of the two trade marks The Respondent also notes that the web

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Wolfe FA 275419 Nat Arb Forum July 18 2004 The froogles.com domain name is not confusingly similar to Complainant GOOGLE mark The dissimilar letters in the domain name are sufficiently different to make it

prior panel decisions in Google Inc v Namerental.com Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 and Pfizer Inc v Enamecorp.com WIPO Case No D2001-0791 B Respondent The Respondent did not respond to the Complaint Complainant �s statement of

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

where third parties such as Google or Yahoo control that content Respondent is not accountable Respondent refers to Admiral Insurance Services v Dicker D2005-0241 WIPO June 4 2005 the Panel accepts that the terms under which Google makes its

fact the top ten results of a Google search of the term �kwandwe � all refer to the Complainant �s mark and service The Complainant has built valuable goodwill and a strong reputation in KWANDWE and all composite marks accompanying the mark KWANDWE

The search results on Google conducted now are irrelevant to the period in question from 1993 thorough 2005 because Google only allows for searches that go back to November 2005 nine months after registration of the domain name at issue

el motor de búsqueda Google misma que incluye tanto el sitio del Promovente como aquél del Titular ix La utilización por parte del Titular del nombre de dominio en la forma que lo ha venido haciendo configura un acto ilegal al hacerse

names were obtained from Google �s AdWords program Respondent contends that Respondent �s representative contacted Complainant �s representative after receipt of the Complaint and offered to transfer the domain name to the Complainant without