�s name �Nick Cannon � on google.com on August 21  2005 and at least one hundred thousand appearances of the Complainant �s name were observed The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated substantial use of the name Nick Cannon � in

posted by the AdSense Google program also do not amount to a use in bad faith having in mind the generic nature of the WITH word As to past uses Complainant does not evidence a use in bad faith by Respondent in 2002 2004 or 2005 Were it

Complainant submits that a Google search for the term �UOB � reveals a long series of references to the Complainant and that none of the search results refer to the Respondent �s website or the Disputed Domain Name The Complainant contends that

U.S trademark registrations a Google search for clear blue and government information as to the corporate existence of Clear Blue Technologies Inc B Respondent Respondent has submitted a deficient Response in accordance with ICANN Rule 5 a The

una simple búsqueda en Google Por todo ello el Demandante pide la transferencia del nombre de dominio B Demandado Aunque el Demandado lo sitúa en último lugar entiendo que lo correcto es comenzar diciendo que el Demandado se allana a las

the Respondent �s website A Google search on the words �quintessentially � and �concierge � brings up the Respondent �s website as the first result It is entirely natural that customers and potential customers of the Complainant would search

en Internet a través de Google.com habría dado como resultado que MENTOS es una marca comercial ampliamente usada por Perfetti Van Melle que es el tercer mayor fabricante de productos de confitería del mundo La Demandante termina su escrito

FA 791657 November 13  2006 Google Inc v Burns NAF Case No FA 726096 August 16  2006 The Cheesecake Factory Inc and The Cheesecake Factory Assets Co LLC v Say Cheesecake WIPO Case No D2005-0766 September 12 2005 Napster Inc v Giovanni Vinscani

top Internet search engines Google Yahoo and MSN have revealed Complainant �s website as the number one search result for the term �MYSPACE � Respondent �s only use of the disputed domain name since registration has been to post a web page

Policy Paragraph 4 b i See Google Inc v Jennifer Burns FA 726096 Nat Arb Forum Aug 16 2006 But Policy Paragraph 4 b i requires that the purchase of the domain name for purposes of selling it for consideration in excess of out-of-pocket costs be

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

be added to this that a Google search confirms that the companies of the Complainants � group are generally known as �Elite Model � that the trade name of one of the Complainants is �Elite Model Management � and that the name �Elite Model �

upon famous marks like GOOGLE GOOGLEpt.com and eBay pornEBAY.com As with the domain names at issue in this proceeding these domain names infringe upon famous Internet-related trademarks This pattern of cybersquatting constitutes a bad faith

and other jurisdictions See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that a complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of trademark registrations around the world see also Thermo Electron

Respondent does not know how Google �s program works and does not know how Google �s geo-targeting system works �Geo-targeting � is a method which Google uses to provide different search results to visitors in different geographic locations based

similar to the mark See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

Property Organization See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Thermo

of Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

and the Eiffel Tower A recent Google search by Complainant revealed over 53300 results for the KERNE ERICKSON mark Respondent registered the kerneerickson.com domain name on April 30 2006 and has used the disputed domain name since that date to

for �assessment � An advanced Google search for SESS carried out by the Respondent excluding references to the Complainant yielded over 1.5 million third party uses of SESS this search is annexed to the Response as Exhibit 3 SESS is an extremely