alsoprotects YouTube and Google from lawsuits citing in support a link to Wikipedia The Respondent further states that these provisions require the trademark holder to give fair warning of abuse The Respondent further points to the role of

recorders gadgets etc A Google search for �digital spy � which excludes concepts related to the Complainant �s business yields over� 80000 results The Respondent is based in the United States of America and did not know of the alleged

s STATE FARM mark see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

two Internet search engines Google and Yahoo each return the familymeds.com � website as the first choice The Respondent easily could have determined that family meds � was already associated with the Complainant even assuming that he did not

even registered or purchased Google Adwords �Compiere � or �Compiere training � in an attempt to direct persons seeking the Complainant �s training materials to its infringing sites and materials Annex 8 Pak Decl Paragraph 11 and Ex I Such a

even registered or purchased Google Adwords �Compiere � or �Compiere training � in an attempt to direct persons seeking the Complainant �s training materials to its infringing sites and materials Annex 8 Pak Decl Paragraph 11 and Ex I Such a

relies on the results of a Google search intended to exclude references to Complainant that resulted in over 180000 third party websites containing the term Respondent registered the domain name because it was a common term when he was unaware

traffic statistics and Google search results as evidence of public recognition of its mark In Tuxedos By Rose v Nunez FA 95248 Nat Arb Forum Aug 17 2000 the panel found that the complainant had common law rights in a mark where its use was

two terms to it see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

separation indicated by Google Maps to be approximately 1460 miles or about 22 1/2 hours by road between Respondent in Austin Texas and the member store in West Valley City Utah and the only Respondent contention on the point is not evidenced

search on the Internet using Google and Yahoo engines and received confirmation that the letters BNP while certainly identifying the Complainant are also firmly associated with the British National Party of which the Respondent was a member until

by earning money from the Google Ad Sense service or the like through re-routing visitors to the website to other websites in exchange for payment Also at the disputed domain name website the Respondent apparently uses the Complainant �s mark

No FA791657 November 13 2006 Google Inc v Burns NAF Case No FA 726096 August 16 2006 The Cheesecake Factory Inc and The Cheesecake Factory Assets Co LLC v Say Cheesecake WIPO Case No D2005-0766 September 12  2005 Napster Inc v Vinscani WIPO Case

widespread use For example a Google search for the term hershey returns 1500000 hits while the term hershey hotels returns more than 1300000 hits Notably the entry for Respondent s site shows up as the fifth site in the sequence for unpaid ads and

states that he conducted a Google search and submits the following examples of other entities or domain names embodying the acronym or name UFA 1 a co-operative with 34 farm supply stores in Alberta �www.ufa.net � 2 the Ufa Airport in Russia

that it ranks first in a Google search the Respondent submits that this contention is only valid for Google in France �www.google.fr � Regarding the Complainant �s contention that it has been using �Geopack �Industries � as a trade name since

com �www 2000 00 google �info@siliconspace No  D2000-0624 info@siliconspace �info siliconspace.com info access directory and or

FA791657 November 13  2006 Google Inc v Burns NAF Case No.FA 726096 August 16  2006 The Cheesecake Factory Inc and The Cheesecake Factory Assets Co LLC v Say Cheesecake WIPO Case No D2005-0766 September 12 2005 Napster Inc v Vinscani WIPO

character The results of a Google search against these words produces results shows that there at least 303 million and 367 million Internet pages use the respective words Texas a place name and instruments a word with many diversified meanings

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear