trademark rights See e.g Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp WIPO Case No D2001-0125 Madonna Ciccone p/k/a Madonna v Dan Parisi and �Madonna.com � WIPO Case No D2000-0847 The Panel will therefore now proceed to a discussion of the third element of the

registrations An advanced Google search for HSM yielded 1.9 million third-party results � A finding of bad faith registration and use requires evidence that the Respondent knew of the Complainant or its mark The Panel finds that there is not

the disputed domain name uses Google Adsense to display ads on the website Google randomly chooses which ads are displayed on the page Respondent has no affiliation with the third-party vendors that choose to use APA s name in their ads Google Ads

that he included ads from Google �s AdSense program on his website that might contain ads for other weight loss products Finally the Respondent alleges that he has put a disclaimer on his website in order to point out that there is no relation

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

Respondent notes that a Google search for Bond Diamond yields references to Bond Diamond as a cutting device that can be made from various types of materials Respondent argues that BOND DIAMOND is a generic designation FINDINGS Complainant

894 00 hits and through the Google search engine which yielded some 1.5 Million hits listings of the search results giving the top hits appear in hard-copy form in Annexes C and D respectively to the Response Second the Respondent claims that he

six stroke engine and a Google search shows some 6 million references to the expression As a corollary there is no evidence to show that the expression has taken on a significant secondary meaning associated with engines Moreover there is no

search engines such as Google and Yahoo COMPLAINANT argues that Respondent registered the potterybarn.org domain name that includes COMPLAINANT POTTERY BARN trademark At the time COMPLAINANT contacted Respondent with its demand letter

words battery and space on Google and has submitted evidence of expenditure as an annex to the Additional Submissions Moreover from December of 2002 through the end of 2005 Complainant generated over 6.2 million in revenue via the website

Complainant s BARBIE mark In Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 the panel found that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy

Respondent showed from its Google search Annex 1 and from other websites listed Annex 2 that many other persons could also claim rights to this domain name Through these proceedings Complainant is trying to secure a registration which he has

Panel at the search engine Google reveals a great number of hits/links related to Complainant and the first ten hits are directly related to Complainant s web site at www.statefarm.com and/or to other sites describing Complainant s services It

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

search for FAIRVIEW and basic Google search for term �fairview lender mortgage � conducted by Panelist Abbott on April 15  2007 Given that FAIRVIEW is not registered by Complainant and lacks a presumption of validity is borderline suggestive in

sur le moteur de recherche Google attestent de cette notoriété ainsi d �ailleurs qu �un sondage IPSOS Des décisions des Offices de marques tels que l �INPI l �OHMI et l �OMPI attestent de cette connaissance des marques du requérant ainsi qu

of links including sponsored Google links to third-party websites including dating services that compete with Complainant After Respondent received a cease-and-desist letter from Complainant Respondent offered to sell both domain names to

on search engines such as Google to ensure that a person typing in Atlanta Home Show will encounter Respondent s web site at the top of the search results Complainant contends that its repeated attempts to negotiate a transfer of the domain

for each other see also Google Inc v Wolfe FA 275419 Nat Arb Forum July 18 2004 The froogles.com domain name is not confusingly similar to Complainant GOOGLE mark The dissimilar letters in the domain name are sufficiently different to make it

differences matter see also Google Inc v Wolfe FA 275419 Nat Arb Forum July 18 2004 The froogles.com domain name is not confusingly similar to Complainant GOOGLE mark The dissimilar letters in the domain name are sufficiently different to make it