Domain Names are provided by Google as shown by the Ads by Google link displayed above the advertisements The Ads by Google link connects to Google s web page describing its AdSense program that serves ads to website owners and pays commissions to

third parties The first 300 Google results for a search on �credit master � do not include any reference to the Complainant This constitutes a legitimate interest of the Respondent Many other companies use the term �credit master � in their name

that Respondent arranged with Google which has resulted in posting of advertisements on the screens to which the domain name routes Some of these advertisements promote products that are not Black & Decker �s Complainant also suggests that

pages operate by pulling in Google Adsense advertisements using the Disputed Domain Names including Complainant �s PROFORCE trademark as keywords The advertisements displayed on Respondent �s websites advertise products and services the compete

who clicks �Chase Select � on Google is directed to the official �chaseselectloans.com � web page where Complainant offers its educational loan services Respondent registered the domain names chaseselect.com and chaseselectloan.com on July 19 and

Burgos � in the search engine google The Complainant underlines that the Respondent cannot legitimately operate in the Internet with the domain name cajaburgos.com which is one of the most important commercial domains in the Internet and one of the

for Coochy products via Google Respondent considers Complainant is abusing the arbitration process in trying to take away what has become a valuable asset through Respondent s online marketing expertise and search engine optimization

is the first result from a Google search for the term aprov which is indeed correct but then Complainant fail to identify themselves with the search result which is a business called AProv using the domain names aprovlondonescorts.com and

by the search provider Google/Yahoo and by the activities of advertisers who pay Google/Yahoo to have their advertisements appear whenever keywords are entered as a search term Having apparently gone out of its way to place its link in a 2nd

submitted a screenshot of a Google search of the mwdirect.com domain name which displays a reference to Respondent s company as the first result Complainant claims that Respondent is a competitor of Complainant and is therefore attempting to

que le moteur de recherche Google cite en premier le site �www.surprise.fr � comme se rapportant à du prêt-à-porter et à des vêtements c �est-à-dire l �activité des requérantes Mais en cliquant sur le lien on est immédiatement redirigé

programs like Overture or Google Adwords based on the words contained in the domain name These landing pages arguably provide little societal benefit but the relevant question here is whether they represent a �use in connection with a bona

D2007-0186 ggoogle.com with GOOGLE Google Inc v Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 In the case at hand the Panel finds that the domain name creditmutuels.com and the CREDIT MUTUEL trademark are confusingly similar based

he was taken to a list of Google search results headed �Did you mean �www.volvocars.com � � The first result on this Google search page was for a website at �www.blockalert.com � with the note �The website at the Domain Name was apparently

as ads provided through the Google Adsense program Respondent alleges that the advertisements and links in question are provided pursuant to Google s terms and are not controlled by the Respondent Respondent states that Respondent may fairly use

has established rights A Google search for Respondent does not reveal any websites which suggest Respondent has established rights or legitimate interests in the domain names Complainant �s representative contacted Respondent on August 22 2007

Arbitration Forum DECISION Google Inc v Sanjay Nimbalkar Claim Number FA0708001068746 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by James L Vana of Perkins Coie LLP 1201 3rd Ave Suite 4800 Seattle WA 98101 Respondent is Sanjay

as ads provided through the Google Adsense program Complainants were like all others in the United States and around the world free to purchase advertisements through Google had they so chose As one panel has held The Panel considers that the use

a designated news source for Google News The Complainant �s main contention is that the domain names are confusingly similar to its mark and is a classic case of typo-piracy The Respondent Keyword Marketing Inc a/k/a Marketing Total S.A and Domain

Sedo.com that is a partner of Google.com This homepage wasn �t used to divert Internet users from looking at the Complainant �s website Even if Respondent had constructive knowledge of the Complainant �s registered trademark rights the use by the