by search providers such as Google and Yahoo The Complainant furnished a printout of the website associated with the Domain Name on February 13 2008 The landing page was headed �Kooks.com What you need when you need it � The landing page featured

appeared in the search engine google.com Why do I have to lose money Valium sell thousands of sites and write that the Valium Why should I lose this domain I don �t know yet I had not bought the domain name OfficialSiteofValium.org � � This email

similar to the mark see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

since 1995 Searches on Google for the first Complainant �s mark produce numerous websites referring to the first Complainant Rights or legitimate interests The Complainants contend that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in

The Complaint exhibits a GOOGLE search conducted for NUTRISYSTEM on February 4 2008 which produced approximately 3 million hits the majority of which the Complainant says refer to it or its products or services 4.B The Respondent 4.B.1 In the

through the search engine at google.com 10 The Respondent has also used the Domain Name in bad faith The Respondent �s advice that he had received an offer of 3800 Euros for the Domain Name which was not supported by any corroborating evidence

of all domain names See Google Inc v Goog LR FA 98462 Nat Arb Forum Sept 28 2001 finding the respondent s googlr.com domain name confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark because the only difference between the domain name and the mark

argues that an ordinary Google search provides that of the first one hundred results regarding the term �Mastellone � more than its 90 referred to the Complainant The Complainant appears to suggest that a Google search for the Respondent �s

similar to the mark see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

Nat Arb Forum Nov 13 2006 Google Inc v Burns FA 726096 Nat Arb Forum Aug 16 2006 Cheesecake Factory Inc & The Cheesecake Factory Assets Co LLC v Say Cheesecake D2005 �0766 WIPO Sept 12 2005 Napster Inc v Vinscani D2005 �0531 WIPO July 19 2005

by the complainant see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

complainant s marks see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

with industry leaders Google and Yahoo Second the links in question are provided pursuant to Yahoo or Google s terms and are triggered by search requests entered by computer users Respondent may fairly use geographic descriptive or generic

s use is not exclusive a Google search of RCU credit union returned 13100 results including Redwood Credit Union Rochdale Credit Union Rosenort Credit Union Railways Credit Union Riverside Credit Union Revelstoke Credit Union and Riverview

through the web search engine Google and the results are exclusively related to Complainant and its Greater China s past web portal Finally the disputed domain name airfrance-greaterchina.mobi is identical to the domain name

the Respondent �s reliance on Google searches results for �porta john � and �portajohn � inadequate to show either 1 substantial generic use of PORTA-JOHN by the Complainants � competitors with respect to the same or similar goods or services or 2

confusingly similar to them A Google search for the term eleaner has Google asking if the searcher meant Eleanor and a search for eleaners has Google asking if the searcher meant cleaners By way of comparison a search for genereal motors has Google

� into a search engine like Google Yahoo or MSN � The website encourages visitors to �contact us � about listing advertisements in any of the Respondent �s � com TV channels � The Respondent registered the Domain Names on January 15 2002 and

par exemple par Lycos ou Google Ses connaissances couvrent de nombreux aspects du commerce en ligne du design jusqu �au e-marketing Aussi le Défendeur avait nécessairement connaissance du site �www.vente-privee.com � lors de l

advantage of this fact The Google search for the term �wirecard � leads to 431000 hits all of which lead to Complainant Complainant hereby contends that Respondent has no relationship with Complainant and the trademark WIRECARD is not one that