ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Google Inc v Edmunds Gaidis Case No DRO2008-0020 1 The Parties The Complainant is Google Inc California of United States of America represented by Rominvent S.A Romania The Respondent is Edmunds Gaidis Rezekne of

Complainant trademarks in Google advertisements which have been removed by Google upon a complaint lodged by Complainant According to Complainant Respondent uses Complainant trademarks to spread Respondent negative opinions about Complainant

zijn gegenereerd door het Google AdSense programma op basis van de Domeinnaam is Verweerder verantwoordelijk voor deze keuze Het is immers van algemene bekendheid dat een dergelijk programma advertenties op de parking page plaatst die verband

a domain name without a prior Google search seems to be wilful sic blindness Google results show that no one has exclusive rights to the word fossi even now In many cases respondents use Google to show the generic nature of their domains That is

a search on the search engine Google for SDGE POWER which is above links that all refer to Complainant and Complainant s SDGE Marks and services Respondent has no Rights or Legitimate Interests in the Domain ICANN Rule 3 b ix 2 ICANN Policy

an error message when a Google search is conducted and a similar response with an Internet Explorer search Complaint Annexure K 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant In a detailed Complaint the Complainant alleges that each of the respective

by the Complainant In fact a Google search of the term actimelisiert leads to web pages related to the Complainant products However typing in the disputed domain names directs Internet users to the Respondent inactive website This leads to

Inc WIPO Case No D2005-0623 A Google search of prescription cosmetics produces many results in the descriptive sense and none of the first ten results refer to the Complainant or its related entities The Panel finds that the Complainant has on the

a domain name with over 50000 Google results generating high traffic and that the parked webpage offered by the disputed domain sponsor does not show any content relating to the Complainant Finally the Respondent asks the Panel and the Center to

reliance on the results of a Google search conducted on August 4 2008 reflecting that chillibeans.com.br which resolves to the Complainants website is the most popular search result for the search term chilli beans The Complainants contend that

initially deferred to Google as to what ads were shown and b as evidenced by an email that is Response Exhibit 4 Respondent subsequently asked the provider to disable the landing page for the domain name at issue until Respondent can

contention including pages of Google search results for the search term cblc copies of websites featuring cblc in their URLs and a list of results from the website www.acronymattic.com which specialises in listing entities corresponding to initial

The Respondent says that a Google search for rentals will produce not only links to property rental websites but also to car hire rentals DVD rentals and rentals of TV and other domestic appliances In total the Respondent says that the word

the most popular result on a google search for PBGC In light of the above the Panel is satisfied that the identifier PBGC has achieved sufficient secondary meaning in association with the Complainant and the Complainant services to establish

the most popular result on a Google search for PBGC In light of the above the Panel is satisfied that the identifier PBGC has achieved sufficient secondary meaning in association with the Complainant and the Complainant services to establish

The Complainant has run a Google search on the expression Copacabana Palace The first ten results referred to the Complainant hotel The Complainant owns the following registered trade marks i The word mark COPACABANA PLACE with effect from

buscadores de Internet i.e Google y Yahoo el término LACAIXA la mayoría de los resultados obtenidos hacen referencia al Promovente o sociedades constituidas por el Promovente lo que muestra que LA CAIXA es sin duda una marca reconocida y de

mark with the USPTO see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Respondent s

whether direct or through Google The Respondent says that from July 16 2008 the Domain Name has been used in connection with the offering of online games providing information on online games providing online video content and offering

domain name contains Google pay-per-click advertisements some of which lead to online sales of ACCUTANE and competitive products including at least one site purporting to ship ACCUTANE and competitive products into the United States of