rights in the mark see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Respondent s

assertions Respondent s googleacompanhantes.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googleacompanhantes.com domain name Respondent registered and

G GRANAROLO mark see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

page that directs people to a Google search page or to a Google e-mail service see nyseliffe.com and www.nyseliffe.com 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant The Complainants argue that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks

Trademark Office records or a Google search would have quickly revealed the PFAELZER mark and name Respondent real identity is masked by the generic name under which the disputed domain name is registered Respondent refused acceptance of

use a search engine such as Google or may try to guess the URL A user whose Internet search for Evian alone or in any combination turned up eviandetox.com might visit the website Instead of reaching the Complainant business they would be led to

sur une requête Google du 28 janvier 2009 renvoie aux activités du Requérant et sur requête spécifique désignait une page de parking gérée par un courtier Sedo Le Requérant demande le transfert à son profit du nom

DANONE A simple search via Google or any other search engine for the keyword DANONE demonstrates that all first results relate to the Complainant products or news The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name danoneindia.com was

This Respondent exhibits Google search results as evidence of this 5.15 The Respondent also refers to a large number of cases involving the NetIdentity business which are said to show that that the Respondent activities do not involve bad

The Respondent relies upon a Google search of the term frontrunners which returned more than 1.64 million results as reflecting the broad and varied use of the term According to the Respondent the Complainant is nowhere to be found among the

registration No 3140793 GOOGLE covering goods and services in International Classes 11 12 16 18 21 25 28 35 38 and 42 application date September 18 2001 The domain name google.com has been registered on September 15 1997 The Complainant owns

assertions Respondent s googlevideodownload.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googlevideodownload.com domain name Respondent registered and

registration No 3140793 GOOGLE covering goods and services in Int Classes 11 12 16 18 21 25 28 35 38 and 42 application date September 18 2001 The domain name google.com was created on September 15 1997 The Complainant also owns and operates

supported by the results of a Google search for EDDY MERCKX provided by the Complainant The owner of the Disputed Domain Name is Irfan Khalil The Disputed Domain Name was registered on March 23 2000 The website attached to the Disputed Domain Name

meaning of the UDRP see e.g Google Inc v Jeltes Consulting/N Tea Pty Ltd WIPO Case No D2008-0994 The Panel concludes that the third requirement of the UDRP is satisfied 7 Decision For all the foregoing reasons in accordance with paragraphs 4 i of

measurements supplied by Google Analytics some thirty percent of visitors to the livescore.com website come from Asia with Thailand and Vietnam being some of the most users Moreover livescore.com has sizeable user traffic emanating from India

asserts rights in the GOOGLE mark through registration with the USPTO and Complainant s long standing use of the GOOGLE mark Even though Respondent registered the googl.com domain name on January 24 2001 before the USPTO registered

por medio del servicio Google Ads referidos a productos y servicios conectados con el mercado de los automóviles De hecho entre otros anuncios el Experto ha podido comprobar que se incluyen incluso anuncios referidos al sitio web de la

until January 2009 that the Google Adsense links displayed on this website included advertisements related to the TAPS mark when viewed from the United States Respondent claims that he had never heard of Complainant TAPS until this time

name For example in a Google search for Dynamic Language the first listing for Complainant occurs on page 4 while Respondent is not even listed A similar search on Yahoo shows both companies on page 1 but Complainant is number 2 and refers