with the disputed domain name Google searches for Manuel Mota identify only the Complainant and its well-known wedding dress designer Manuel Mota Therefore prior to any notice of this complaint the Respondent has not used the domain names in

bznkofamerica.com goofgle.com google4.com facewbook.com craigslisst.org freiendster.com amnestyinternational.org photobucket.org lycos.org lycosasia.com moorgate.com and cottonell.com As with other domain names registered by the Respondent the

the first ten pages of a Google search for The Jay Leno Show contain no reference to the Respondent website and searches on Yahoo and MSN yielded the same results Although the Respondent acknowledges that the potential to profit from this

confusion maintaining that a Google search for Jay Leno The Jay Leno Show or even Weeknights with Jay Leno does not return a link to his website The Respondent denies that he registered the disputed domain name primarily for the purpose of selling

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

the mark with the USPTO See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

of Respondent s residence See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also KCTS

world including the USPTO See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Morgan

fuarı is entered into the Google search engine the first result is the Respondent website and in the heading it clearly states yapifuari.com Sanal Yapi Fuarı Virtual Build Fair the disputed domain name whereas the Complainant yemfuar.net

pay-per-click ads by Google on the website The domain was registered in bad faith and/or is being used in bad faith for the following reasons inter alia The domain was originally registered by Success National Bank in 1996 After Success

mark is merely descriptive Google lists over 32 million web pages using the phrase cheap auto insurance Complainant provides no evidence of any use of the mark prior to 1999 Until 2006 the use was limited to the cheap-auto-insurance.com domain

has produced a printout of a Google search which appeared to show that the Domain Name resolved to a website at www.pornosbest.com The Google search carried a warning visiting this website may harm your computer and referred to harmful software

Moreover a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword DANONKI shows that all first results relate to Complainant products In these circumstances it is hard to believe that Respondent was unaware of the existence of

use in a search engine like Google when looking for comparative insurance companies offering low rates on automobile insurance On or about August 7 2003 Respondent registered the at-issue domain name through a privacy shield The website

a/k/a Josh Green supra citing Google Inc v wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Siavesh Behain WIPO Case No D2000-1240 Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha Casio Computer Co Ltd v Jongchan Kim WIPO Case No D2003-0400 Downstream Technologies LLC v Bartels System GmbH

out that a search on the Google search engine for the disputed domain name yields no web site associated with the domain name Instead the first result is for Respondent s commercial web site at joshwhitford.com which uses the name

throughout the world See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

has put in evidence a Google search against the term pick n pay conducted on March 19 2009 on the South African page of Google However no explanation is provided as to why this provides any evidence that the Respondent should have known

no content except for a Google Apps template for new websites Respondent s perotsystems-mail.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s PEROT SYSTEMS mark Respondent does not have any rights to or legitimate interests in the

based upon results of Google searches of the term DICOTA searches at both Google.com and Google.com.sg return more than 5 million results with at least the first several pages of results referring virtually exclusively to Complainant