Recent Case Activity

Displaying results 7281 - 7300 of 9223 matches
20|50|100 results per page
Case Number Domain(s) Complainant Respondent Ruleset Status
1302464
diseny.com
dsiney.com
Disney Enterprises, Inc.JalapenoWare LLCUDRP22-Feb-2010
letters in the mark see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1301876
rbsaply.com
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plcDealwaveUDRP22-Feb-2010
registrations worldwide See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Am Int
1301619
hhottopic.com
hottopiv.com
hottopyc.com
[3 MORE]
Hot Topic, Inc.Transure Enterprise Ltd c/o Host MasterUDRP22-Feb-2010
the disputed domain name See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1301281
hottoopic.com
Hot Topic, Inc.Whois-Privacy.Net Ltd c/o DN ManagerUDRP22-Feb-2010
the disputed domain name See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1296190
bluennile.com
bluesnile.com
luenile.com
Blue Nile Inc.Bin g Glu c/o G Design, no sale- building aka Digi Real Estate Foundation c/o NA NaUDRP22-Feb-2010
the Complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1296479
direct-tv.com
DirecTV, Inc.Pimenov PavelUDRP19-Feb-2010
this website features Ads By Google as acknowledged by Respondent The ads feature links to both Complainant and its main competitors Comcast DishTV and others Respondent even provides an accounting of such Google ad revenue amounting to
1301870
calbelas.com
Cabela's, Inc.COMDOT INTERNET SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITEDUDRP19-Feb-2010
the Complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1294457
gardeningwithkids.com
National Gardening Association, Inc.CK Ventures Inc.UDRP16-Feb-2010
third party results in a Google search The disputed domain name has been used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services namely Yahoo auto-generated pay-per-click advertisements relating to gardening or gardening with
1301381
travelocidy.com
travelocite.com
travelocitu.com
[4 MORE]
Travelocity.com LPVenta c/o Leonard Bogucki aka The data in Bulkregister.com's WHOIS database is p c/o NA aka Registrate Co. c/o NA NAUDRP17-Feb-2010
in spelling see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1301940
aeropostlae.com
Aeropostale, Inc.SL PaceUDRP17-Feb-2010
from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1301618
hottpoic.com
Hot Topic, Inc.Ruben GarciaUDRP17-Feb-2010
the Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1301347
ringcenteral.com
RingCentral, Inc.Ruben GarciaUDRP17-Feb-2010
from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1301277
charoltterusse.com
Charlotte Russe Merchandising, Inc.Diamond Point Enterprises Limited c/o Diamond PointUDRP17-Feb-2010
the complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1300854
vansgirl.com
Vans Inc.Transure Enterprise Ltd aka Host MasterUDRP17-Feb-2010
name from the mark see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear
1299852
mygooglemp3.com
Google Inc.Vicious ContentUDRP15-Feb-2010
arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Vicious Content Claim Number FA0912001299852 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Meredith M Pavia of Fenwick & West LLP California USA Respondent is Vicious Content Respondent
1300089
statefarmlive.com
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySevren MaynardUDRP15-Feb-2010
issued June 11 1996 See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Morgan
D2009-1797
ibis-sarcelles.com
mercure-arcachon.com
mercure-atlantel.com
[1 MORE]
AccorValue-Domain Com08-Feb-2010
Trademark registrations See Google Inc v DktBot.org NAF Claim No 286993 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Respondent domain names
D2009-1730
googlecashwealth.com
Google Inc.J. Vinay Sagar/Ranjan Narula Associates08-Feb-2010
terms cash and wealth to the GOOGLE mark Given Google branding policy whereby Google typically uses its house mark GOOGLE with a descriptive word or phrase users seeing the domain name are even more likely to believe the domain name originates
D2009-1695
mycostcodiet.com
Costco Wholesale Corporation Costco Wholesale Membership Inc.First Class Fitness08-Feb-2010
Case No D2004-0784 citing Google Inc v wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Siavesh Behain WIPO Case No D2000-1240 Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Casio Computer Co Ltd v Jongchan Kim WIPO Case No D2003-0400 Downstream Technologies LLC v Bartels System GmbH WIPO
D2009-1724
google74.com
Google Inc.Ajan, Ozel Ajan (269186)03-Feb-2010
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Google Inc v Ajan Ozel Ajan 269186 Case No D2009-1724 1 The Parties The Complainant is Google Inc of California United States of America represented by Ranjan Narula Associates of India The Respondent is Ajan Ozel Ajan