from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

confusing similarity see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

name from the mark see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

from the Marks In fact a Google search for the terms word pr and ss yields no organic results and only shows links referring to Complainant Respondent intentionally used the Marks without consent from Complainant Respondent was put on

times each month based on Google The ISLIP MACARTHUR AIRPORT word mark has become well known through its continuous and exclusive use in connection with Complainant since the airport was officially named Islip MacArthur Airport in the 1960s

as Cricket Communications Google and Nokia under its PAYROLLING.COM mark Complainant asserts that it uses the TIMEQ.COM mark in conjunction with its PAYROLLING.COM mark Complainant contends that it has also used the TIMEQ.COM mark since it

content Respondent s google-1.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent is not commonly known by the google-1.com domain name Complainant has not authorized Respondent to use its GOOGLE mark in any way

in a URL see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

of the ALR EVENTS was run in Google on 9/10/2010 The abrevents.net domain appears on the same page of search results with the Complainant s website alrevents.com Consumers are likely to assume that the two websites bear some relation to each other

Village street address on Google maps a print-out whereof is annexed as Annexure-2 and shows that Lost Tree Village is not identified as a geographic location · The complainant also alleges that nowhere in the Response does the Respondent

of confusing similarity See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

μ á ² ó à ± ￡áí Google Inc Aloysius Thevarajah NAF ° t±ào FA0911001295342 2009 ù YPolicy 4 a ii ï¿¡ °± Ã÷ a óò μ óμóDè ï¿¡ í ò3é μ úèYó oè e ± ï¿¡ à oó￡ è ± éù3 í3ò óò ùòé a 1 ò2 °ì·¨

with the letter e see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

in a domain name see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

google-analltics google-anallytics google-analyfics google-analytisc google-analytlcs google-apalytics google-aqalytics google-avalitics google-azalitics google-nalytics google-server01 google-server02 google-server03 google-server10

from a complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation