Recent Case Activity

Displaying results 6861 - 6880 of 9223 matches
20|50|100 results per page
Case Number Domain(s) Complainant Respondent Ruleset Status
1345375
statefarmdiscountcheck.com
statefarmdiscountdoublecheck.com
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCallum MacgregorUDRP
20-Oct-2010
two terms to it see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear
1345499
marylandsquare.info
Mason Companies, Inc.Liu JiapengUDRP
19-Oct-2010
to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also
1345193
buymarlboro.us
Philip Morris USA Inc.Bertin Joy LoraUSDRP
19-Oct-2010
distinct from the mark See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear
1344877
kolercn.com
Kohler Co.chenjintaoUDRP
19-Oct-2010
mark with the USPTO see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant
1344104
discount-skechers.com
Skechers U.S.A. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. IIYu Aijuan c/o YuaijuanUDRP
19-Oct-2010
mark with the USPTO see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant
1343947
buy-ftd-flowers.com
find-ftd-flowers.com
floristsftd.net
[7 MORE]
Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.Speedeenames c/o Andrew MortonUDRP
17-Oct-2010
the mark is registered See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also
1343712
skechershapeup.com
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. IIlin jianhuaUDRP
17-Oct-2010
Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also
1343645
wwwsnagajob.com
SnagAJob.com, Inc.MuscariHoldingLimited c/o Domain AdminUDRP
15-Oct-2010
advertising consolidator Google to return search results from the database on the basis of Google perceived understanding of the contextual relationships between the disputed domain name and search terms for which advertisers have paid
1344354
enterprsie.com
Enterprise Holdings, Inc.Rakshita Mercantile Private LimitedUDRP
16-Oct-2010
from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
D2010-1376
power-alstom-usa.com
AlstomFuture ISP
01-Oct-2010
Besides a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword alstom demonstrates that all results relate to the Complainant s websites or business In addition previous UDRP decisions have found that the Complainant s trademarks
1345740
churchilltips.com
Churchill Insurance Co. Ltd.Mark MidlandUDRP
14-Oct-2010
Respondent claims that a Google search for Churchill Tips 6 of the top 20 results or 30 of the results featured a search result that refers to a horse racing tip for Churchill Downs Race Track Exhibit A filed with the Response reproduces the
1344102
googleapp.com
Google Inc.Ruslan MoussaevUDRP
07-Oct-2010
assertions 1 Respondent s googleapp.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googleapp.com domain name 3 Respondent registered and used the
1343911
amexzync.biz
amexzync.mobi
amexzync.net
[1 MORE]
American Express Marketing & Development Corp.Peter BradburyUDRP
14-Oct-2010
Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant
1343692
tarvelocity.com
Travelocity.com LPGioacchino ZerboUDRP
12-Oct-2010
letters in the mark see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1343688
roamanns.com
roamons.com
REDCATS USA, L.P.Dong Wang aka Tan Kim FongUDRP
08-Oct-2010
name from the mark see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1343632
msn-info.com
msnfriend.com
msnhack.com
[1 MORE]
Microsoft CorporationNoori netUDRP
12-Oct-2010
Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also
1342377
shionogi.com
Shionogi & Co. LtdPrivacy Ltd. Disclosed Agent for YOLAPTUDRP
06-Oct-2010
Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also
1342145
devin-harris.com
Devin HarrisAndrey Serkov / Domain Names Sale Lease IndividualUDRP
12-Oct-2010
Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content
1341837
prodigymsn.net
Microsoft CorporationColimense Network c/o Victor Manuel Sanchez ContrerasUDRP
30-Sep-2010
Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that a complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of trademark registrations around the world Respondent s
1341652
marghelgenberger.com
Mary Marg HelgenbergerWing WahUDRP
30-Sep-2010
Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content