6.7 million adult impacts Google statistics showing a total of approximately 33000 visits to the Complainant s website in each of the calendar quarters in which the television advertising occurred Further Google statistics showing that between

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Thermo

to install malicious software Google also has an advisory associated with the resolving website The Panel finds that using the victoriasecret-tr.com domain name to infect users computers with software that maliciously steals private data is not a

Ltd v Whitney supra see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Google Inc v Yang HuaTing Case No DCC2010-0007 1 The Parties The Complainant is Google Inc of Mountain View California United States of America represented by Ranjan Narula Associates India The Respondent is Yang

with SEDO and used by the GOOGLE Adsense system to link to sites for jewellery related products hotels and holidays and he has no control over the way in which the Adsense system brings up other websites whether relating to real estate or

en el portal de búsqueda Google en su división mexicana la palabra trovit arroja miles de resultados concernientes a diversos sitios web en los que se hace referencia al portal de clasificados Que los nombres de dominio en disputa son muy

le fait qu une requête sur Google sur la dénomination Crédit Mutuel donne 5 140 000 résultats Pour ce qui est du second point atteinte aux droits des requérants les Requérants font valoir que l enregistrement comme l utilisation des noms de

from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

trademark authority see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Therefore the

s mark merits acceptance See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

objection from the Respondent Google Inc v Noori net NAF Claim No.1003001311521 Daimler AG v Noori net NAF Claim No.1005001323972 and Credit Industriel et Commercial S.A v Noori net WIPO Case No D2010-0729 The Respondent did not participate in this

not authorized and SEO works Google took the epsonyaziciservisi.com to have This domain name provides us with a new customer we are repairing the old epson printer Why complain What should we do 6 Discussion and Findings The Rules require the

Complainant suggests that a Google search would have shown Complainant to be the first link in a search on Havanna Complainant provides utterly no evidence this was true in 2005 Moreover Google searches themselves are localized Attached as an

s CITIBANK mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Accordingly the

to a complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark