Recent Case Activity

Displaying results 6681 - 6700 of 9223 matches
20|50|100 results per page
Case Number Domain(s) Complainant Respondent Ruleset Status
1371822
aalmo.biz
aalmo.info
Vanguard Trademark Holdings USA LLCola roevik / PropertyUDRP08-Mar-2011
of confusingly similar See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1371257
secretbyvictorias.com
Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Secret By Victorias c/o Sandra OliveiraUDRP03-Mar-2011
Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that a complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of trademark registrations around the world Respondent s
1370357
baylor.org
Baylor UniversityStanley PaceUDRP08-Mar-2011
with a search box including Google Exhibit D shows what the domain actually looks like Accusation Respondent has engaged in a pattern of bad-faith registration Response Complainant is referencing cases that I won Case 1309793 riveron.com Case
1368643
di-noc.com
3M CompanyPaperboy and Co. / Domain Management RepresentativeUDRP15-Mar-2011
Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear
1370517
lef.co
Life Extension Foundation, IncPeter Green d/b/a NDP media CORPUDRP08-Mar-2011
Policy Paragraph4 b iv See Google Inc v Forum LLC supra FA0708001053323 finding bad faith registration and use where googlenews.com resolves to a commercial search engine website generating click-through advertising fees REO Speedwagon Inc v
1369542
oldnavyt.com
opldnavy.com
The Gap, Inc.Tangwangzhongtuo Technology Beijing Co.,Ltd c/o Xinlong TangUDRP07-Mar-2011
Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1368836
steelcaes.com
Steelcase Inc.Rampe PurdaUDRP03-Mar-2011
from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1369486
onetouchultrasmart.net
Johnson & JohnsonLustia VanRibbonMorsonUDRP03-Mar-2011
used in bad faith see also Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content
1367655
oildnavy.com
okldnavy.com
oldfnavy.com
[4 MORE]
The Gap, Inc.齐燕杰 唐王中拓科技(北京)有限责任公司UDRP03-Mar-2011
in domain names see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1370580
uchoicehotel.com
Choice Hotels International, Inc.this domain ForSaleUDRP26-Feb-2011
registrations See also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Here
1370565
cchoicehotels.com
Choice Hotels International, Inc.Stoyan BagdanovUDRP01-Mar-2011
GENERAL mark see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1369685
icraftsman.com
Sears Brands, LLCTerra Serve / Domain AdministratorUDRP02-Mar-2011
with Complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1368384
harleydavidson-japan.com
H-D Michigan, LLCDigirock, Inc. a/k/a Value DomainUDRP03-Mar-2011
mark with the USPTO see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant
1369418
victoriasecretpics.info
Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Crazy Events Domains c/o Rony MeyerUDRP26-Feb-2011
the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content
1367042
skechershape-up.com
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. IIchen xinyiUDRP01-Mar-2011
mark with the USPTO see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world The Panel also
1368660
qvckuk.com
ER Marks, Inc. and QVC, Inc.Charlie Kalopungi aa7group@gmail.comUDRP28-Feb-2011
identifier and a gTLD See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1369540
watchgrammysonline.com
National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.Oskars DombravaUDRP24-Feb-2011
from the mark Similarly in Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 a panel held that the addition of a letter to the mark of another in forming a disputed domain name does not avoid a conclusion of confusing similarity
1369407
victoriasecretsangelcard.com
victoriasecretscreditcard.com
Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Domain Tech Enterprises c/o Domain AdministratorUDRP25-Feb-2011
the disputed domain name See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation
1368289
entreprisecar.com
Enterprise Holdings, Inc.PertshireUDRP22-Feb-2011
from Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark
1366558
uk-anz.com
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group LimitedFredrick KimUDRP18-Feb-2011
to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world The Panel also