Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

to visitors through Ads by Google to the websites of businesses having no apparent connection with the Complainant including competitor businesses offering other toys It may reasonably be concluded that the Respondent s use of the disputed

of search results on the Google search engine The apparent lack of any good faith attempt to ascertain whether or not the Respondent was registering and using someone else s trademarks such as by conducting trademarks searches or search engine

or in any other language A Google search of the term Remy Martin VSOP displays several results related to Complainant Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and is not related in any way with

s business Respondent s googleplacesunleashed.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name Complainant has not authorized or licensed Respondent to use the

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

the Trademark SKYPE in a Google search for Philippines specific or the Republic of Korea specific Google searches where in the www.google.com search the first two hundred related to the Complainant According to the Complainant the fast growing

Beauty Center through Google search engine queries The Complainant attaches copies of screen shots of the web pages successively associated with the Domain Name The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant s letters alleging trademark

assertions 1 Respondent s googleplusone.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googleplusone.com domain name 3 Respondent registered and used the

of Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Am Int

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant

de 2011 detectó a través de Google la existencia de transcobro.es de cuyo contenido afirma que reproducía el nombre la estructura las imágenes y los colores del sitio web del Demandante www.transcobro.com También manifiesta que en el contenido

Ph D www google Bloomberg //www com/intl/en/options/ U S e g googlevideo googlevideos googlemovie googlemovies googleforums googlewebmaster pepsiadventure net pepsitennis googlevideodownload googledatadrive googlenetstorage

Paragraph 4 b iv see also Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

the complainant s mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

van zoekopdrachten via Google.nl waaruit blijkt dat het gebruik van de zoekterm Mediq resulteert in verwijzingen naar Eiser of apotheken handelend onder de naam van Eiser Ook op grond hiervan is het volgens Eiser aannemelijk dat Verweerder

for 8 years and a simple Google search for the term randall s island would have retrieved results that would have made this clear to the Respondent However despite this the Respondent registered the disputed domain name for the purposes of a

of advertisements placed by Google Ads to third-party providers of diet programs There is a prominent photograph and links to the website of a trainer participating in Complainant The Biggest Loser television program There is a disclaimer at the