term legalshield An advanced Google search for legal shield excluding prepaid and legalshieldplus to avoid reference to Complainant yielded 126000000 results with the first two pages including the term legalshield in domains such as legalshield.na

around the world in Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 Based on Complainant s provided evidence and these past decisions the Panel concludes that Complainant has established rights in the YAHOO mark for the

Mr Coster also started using Google Adwords to draw potential glass block customers to the Security Glass Block website Shortly after the renewal of the disputed domain name Milwaukee Glass Block started threatening Security Glass Block with legal

was visually similar see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Autoboss products by Google Ads banner campaigns in selected websites and press ads 2 Complainant says it terminated Respondent s distributorship in July 2008 but if Complainant did so at that time it did not notify Respondent of it A

top-level domain gTLD net In Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 the panel found that the addition of a generic word like buy did not affect the confusingly similar nature of the disputed domain name Similarly in Gillette Co v

Respondent registered the GOOGLE-DNS.COM domain name on or about June 10 2011 The disputed domain name resolves to an inactive website Respondent s GOOGLE-DNS.COM domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent is not

registrations see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

of confusing similarity See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

of registrations for the GOOGLE mark throughout the world The following is a list of just some of these registrations Country Mark Reg No Reg Date Australia Google 1049124 April 4 2005 China Google 1451705 September 28 2000 Norway Google

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

Forum Oct 12 2010 see also Google Inc v Noori net FA 1311521 Nat Arb Forum Apr 29 2010 see also Daimler AG v Noori net FA 1323972 Nat Arb Forum June 23 2010 see also Herbalife Int l of America Inc v Noori net FA 1372476 Nat Arb Forum Mar 23 2011

assertions 1 Respondent s googlehotpot.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googlehotpot.com domain name 3 Respondent registered and used the

a list of results of a Google search for the terms party pictures minus partypics See Annex 6 to the Response Six websites unrelated to Complainant out of the first ten results contain a reference to party pics while the second link shows

sites to rank high in GOOGLE searches l Respondent says that it further optimized those referral sites by causing the referral sites to contain invisible text that reflects the site address and serves to strengthen the search engine

authority the USPTO See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that a complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of trademark registrations around the world This is true without

complainant s marks See also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

Policy Paragraph4 c iv See Google Inc v Gridasov FA 474816 Nat Arb Forum July 5 2005 finding that the respondent s use of a disputed domain name that attempts to download malicious computer software into the computers of those who visit the