arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Domain Administrator m.dowdell@unholdings.com Claim Number FA1111001416796 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Gavin L Charlston of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Domain

trademark registrations See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

APPLE BLACKBERRY CISCO DELL GOOGLE HP NOKIA SAMSUNG SONY and YAHOO This registration of multiple domain names that include third party trademarks Complainant submits is further evidence of Respondent s bad faith registrations B Respondent

assertions 1 Respondent s googler.co domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googler.co domain name 3 Respondent registered and used the googler.co

highly distinctive see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

display advertisements from Google s AdSense program DISCUSSION Paragraph 15 a of the Rules instructs this Panel to decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy these Rules and any rules

USPTO of January 30 2006 See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Goldberg Client Services Inc Claim Number FA1111001414431 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Gavin L Charlston of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Goldberg Client Services

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

legitimate interests in the googlegulf.com googlebahrain.com googlecongo.com googlelibya.com googlesaudiarabia.com googleafghanistan.com googleyemen.com and googlehariri.com domain names 3 Respondent registered and used the googlegulf.com

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Privacy Protections Inc Claim Number FA1111001414441 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Gavin L Charlston of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Privacy Protections Inc

come up in search results on Google and Yahoo The Panel agrees that Respondent has not registered or used the domain name in bad faith See Schering Aktiengesellschaft v Metagen GmbH D2000-0728 WIPO Sept 11 2000 finding that because Respondent

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Kanter Associates SA Claim Number FA1111001414449 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Gavin L Charlston of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Kanter Associates SA Respondent

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

a disputed domain name See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

with Complainant such as Google Voice JahJah and Fringe together with unrelated products DISCUSSION Paragraph 15 a of the Rules instructs this Panel to decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

placement naturally on Google s website Complainant has been aware for more than a decade of Respondent s SEO investment in the domains and has failed to object to or otherwise complain about until now including but not limited to Respondent

Nat Arb Forum Apr 17 2006 Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Respondent

authorities worldwide See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also