Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrates Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b

domain name included the Google search Talkbox and the Google logo thus reflecting Respondent s knowledge of Google s prior rights in the trademark and indicating an effort to cause confusion as to whether the website were affiliated with

assertions 1 Respondent s googlepakistan.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googlepakistan.com domain name 3 Respondent registered and used

name services Respondent s googletvads.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name Complainant has not authorized or licensed Respondent to use its GOOGLE

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

known as ABSOLUTELY GOLF and Google searches yield results relating to the Complainant business However even if the Complainant only had rights in Absolutely Golf and Travel the Domain Name is a shortened version of that mark and there is clearly

as Big Fish Games Download Google Chrome and Advantage Rent A Car Certainly confusion is created as to the source of the disputed domain names when Internet users click through the links displayed Respondent commercially benefits from the

all the major search engines Google Yahoo and Bing using RICHARD BRANSON as the search term Additionally when searching RICHARD BRANSON at Wikipedia.org a user is taken directly to a page dedicated to Sir Richard Charles Nicholas Branson implying

Panelist in the search engine GOOGLE of the words BING MICROSOFT which showed over 400000000 results making evident that to date global consumers recognize the mark BING and the services identified with it and also that the mark BING serves as a

googer.com googlae.com googlecalander.com googlede.com googledevice.com googleen.com googlehomepage.com googleparking.net googlepictures.com googletr.com googlev.com googlp.com googlse.com googlu.com googne.com googole.com googu.com

level 0624 Kangdeock ho aware google-ipad com postmaster@google-ipad Ph D www google Bloomberg //www com/intl/en/options/ U S e g googlevideo googlevideos googlemovie googlemovies googleforums googlewebmaster pepsiadventure net pepsitennis

confusing similarity see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

Internet users under the name GOOGLE the Google Mark and offers a wide range of other products and services in addition to that using the Google Mark Google owns numerous trademark registrations for the GOOGLE Mark dating back to as early as 1999

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

that when put in Websters and Google comes up with infinite mulitituple compilations Respondent s statements appear to be an attempt to characterize Complainant s mark as generic and therefore unprotectable But mere assertions of alternative uses

FINDINGS Complainant Google Inc provides Internet search engine services under its GOOGLE mark Complainant holds numerous trademark registrations for its GOOGLE mark with the Bahamas Registrar General s Department BRGD e.g Reg No 28843

7 8 co in sa gh i e U S googlevideo googlevideos googlemovie googlemovies googleforums googlewebmaster pepsiadventure net pepsitennis No D2011-0790 googlemontenegro googlesex googleloadfiles google-bg ntester jjilll googld googlepowersearch

registered and used the googlepatents.com domain name in bad faith B Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding FINDINGS Complainant Google Inc operates the GOOGLE search engine service through its google.com website

trademark agencies See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also