letters in the mark see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 â ¬ÅThe mere addition of a single letter to the complainantâ ¬ ¢s mark does not remove the respondentâ ¬ ¢s domain names from the realm of confusing

the mark.⠬￾ see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondentâ ¬ ¢s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainantâ ¬ ¢s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as

the mark GAMING CLUB see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainantâ ¬ ¢s GOOGLE mark and noting that ⠬Št he transposition of two letters does not create a

case the Panel conducted a Google search for Tomas Breen Ireland The search disclosed a link to Tomas Breen on Linkedin On the link Tomas Breen is described as a Web Application and UX Developer He is said to have been educated at University of

s rights see in this regard GOOGLE Inc v Abercrombie1 NAF Claim No 101579 where the panel decided that for a well known trademark such as GOOGLE constructive notice is sufficient to fix the Respondent with notice or knowledge of the existing

resultados de búsquedas en Google de la denominación moroccanoil y copias de revistas del sector de belleza De acuerdo a una nota de prensa de fecha 1 de agosto de 2012 ofrecida por la propia Demandante la marca MOROCCANOIL cuenta con apenas

en el motor de búsqueda Google se aprecia que el Titular no es ni ha sido conocido como Marvel y que no existe conexión o relación alguna entre el nombre del Titular y el nombre y marca MARVEL El Titular no es titular de registro de marca

similar to its trademark A Google search of term Repetto displays several results only related to Complainant b Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name Respondent is not affiliated with nor

NAF Claim No FA 791657 Google Inc v Jennifer Burns NAF Claim No FA 726096 The Cheesecake Factory Inc and The Cheesecake Factory Assets Co LLC v Say Cheesecake WIPO Case No D2005-0766 Napster Inc v Giovanni Vinscani WIPO Case No D2005-0531

holds rights in the GOOGLE trademark through its registration of the mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO in-cluding Reg No 2884502 registered Sept 14 2004 In addition to its other products and services Google

à Paragraph 4 a i see also Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainantâ ¬ ¢s GOOGLE mark and noting that ⠬Št he transposition of two letters does not create a

following factual grounds A.Ã Google and the GOOGLE Mark 10.Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Google is a Delaware corporation located in Mountain View California 11.Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã The GOOGLE name was created in 1997 by Stanford Ph.D candidates Larry Page and Sergey Brin.Ã

NAF Claim No FA 791657 Google Inc v Jennifer Burns NAF Claim No FA 726096 The Cheesecake Factory Inc and The Cheesecake Factory Assets Co LLC v Say Cheesecake WIPO Case No D2005-0766 Napster Inc v Giovanni Vinscani WIPO Case No D2005-0531

search engines such as Google Yahoo and Bing The Complainant submits that based on his fame as one of the wealthiest people in the world and his extensive notoriety in the business world the Complainant s name has acquired secondary meaning

thereon are accounted for by Google sponsored advertising servers Respondentâ ¬ ¢s use of the oakleysi.com domain name in this manner does not provide Respondent with rights or legitimate interests as the domain name is used for neither a Policy

Sometimes even if they pay as Google TM did by buying all TLDs in every Country another word will still be opensource and free like the Top Level Domain extension dot google created these days or the google book earlier etc No one can claim nothing

alleges that in fact a Google search of â ¬Åblacklogic⠬￾ does not return any results on the first page having to do with Respondentâ ¬ ¢s business operations Similarly a Google search of â ¬Åblackvpn⠬￾ does not return any

a i ⠬￾ see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum August 4 2004 â ¬Åfinding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world⠬￾

¬ ¢s â ¬Åcurious Google search results in which only search results relating to the Complainant appear.⠬￾à Many other companies and products come up with a search of the letters â ¬ÅLSDA⠬￾ that are not related to Complainant

/ bingoaugustaonline com www google br a k S A NAMEZERO COM e g Inc. SERVICES Index La